Capital and leverage review
Organise capital components, regulatory tiers, risk-weighted assets and adequacy assessments. Retain the eligibility and adjustment support needed to review the reported position.
Risk & financial controls
Review capital, exposure, deposit and reserve positions against an approved institution basis.
PURPOSE & PRACTICE
A ratio is easier to challenge when its components, adjustments and applicable limits can be examined together. The prudential module brings capital, exposure and related control work into a review process with retained source support.
Finance, risk and treasury teams can organise period assessments, explain differences and follow up breaches. The institution’s approved rules and classification determine which measures and workspaces belong in scope.
CAPABILITIES
Organise capital components, regulatory tiers, risk-weighted assets and adequacy assessments. Retain the eligibility and adjustment support needed to review the reported position.
Review exposures with counterparty and connected-group context. Keep the applicable limit basis and the explanation for an exception close to the assessment.
Maintain applicable reserve, deposit and other prudential working papers alongside breach records. Use period evidence to explain movements and track corrective action.
FROM INPUT TO OUTCOME
Agree the reporting date, institution rules, source balances and applicable calculation or assessment basis.
Review mappings, adjustments and differences before presenting the position for independent scrutiny.
Document a breach or unusual movement, assign the response and retain the reviewed period record.
YOUR INSTITUTION, YOUR SCOPE
BANKING INSTITUTIONS
Use the relevant bank prudential framework and supported working papers. Reserve, exposure and capital settings require their own effective-dated approval and source reconciliation.
Explore banking workflows ↗NON-BANKING FINANCIAL COMPANIES
Establish the applicable capital, leverage, concentration and deposit-taking controls for the NBFC. Category and layer are part of the scope decision, not interchangeable bank settings.
Explore NBFC workflows ↗INSIDE THE MODULE
A view from the actual application, with the current module navigation. Open the screenshot to explore it in full.
The reference CRAR view shows assessment counts and input-reconciliation guidance. It illustrates the review workspace, not a certified capital-adequacy result.
Reference bank environment · Captured 12 October 2026SEE THE ESSENTIALS · APPROVED MEMBERS
Actual app screens, clear narration and optional captions. Choose a film to watch with your approved member account.
Risk & financial controls
Inspect capital inputs, calculated positions, exposure concentrations and the evidence behind independent decisions.
Watch in one minute ↗SUPPORT THE CONCLUSION
PRACTICAL QUESTIONS
No. Thresholds, eligibility and effective dates are implementation inputs that require institutional review. The website describes the control workflow rather than prescribing a regulatory calculation.
ICAAP remains a separate specialist application. RegQuanta’s prudential oversight and capital-planning records can support the surrounding governance, with any data exchange separately scoped.
LEARN THE SUBJECT
Understand the numerator, the denominator and the decisions behind the ratio.
Read article ↗Translate a plausible adverse scenario into measurable exposures and decisions.
Read article ↗CONNECTED WORK
LET’S TALK REGULATORY OPERATIONS
Start with your institution, your priorities and the controls that matter.